Consumer Health, Eighth Edition
References for Chapter 2:
Separating Fact from Fiction

  1. Mirkin G. Foreword to Barrett S, Herbert V. The Vitamin Pushers: How the "Health Food" Industry Is Selling America a Bill of Goods. Amherst, N.Y., 1994, Prometheus Books.
  2. Sagan C. The fine art of baloney detection. Parade Magazine, p 12–13, Feb 1, 1987.
  3. Accardo P, Lindsay R. Nutrition and behavior: The legend continues. Pediatrics 93:127–128, 1994.
  4. Haack S. Towards a sober sociology of science. In Gross PR, Levitt N, Lewis MW. The Flight from Science and Reason. New York, 1994, New York Academy of Sciences, p 261.
  5. Doyle RP. How medical facts are developed: Why some are more potent than others. Quackwatch, Oct 7, 2004.
  6. Savits DA and others. Methods in chronic disease epidemiology. In Brownson RC, Remington PL, Davis JR, editors. Chronic Disease Epidemiology and Control. Washington, D.C., 1993, American Public Health Association.
  7. Ernst E and others. The importance of placebo effects. JAMA 273:283, 1995.
  8. The gold standard of research trials. Harvard Heart Letter 2(2):6–7, 1991.
  9. Wennberg JE and others, editors. Outcomes research, PORTs, and health care reform. In Warren KS, Mosteller F. Doing More Good than Harm: The Evaluation of Health Care Interventions. New York, 1993, The New York Academy of Sciences.
  10. Sakethoo K and others. Effects of drinking hot water, cold water, and chicken soup on nasal mucus velocity and airflow resistance. Chest 74:408–410, 1978.
  11. Beecher HK. Surgery as placebo: A quantitative study of bias. JAMA 176:1102–1107, 1961.
  12. Karlowski TR and others. Ascorbic acid and the common cold: A prophylactic and therapeutic trial. JAMA 246:2235–2237, 1975.
  13. Huff D. How to Lie with Statistics. New York, 1954, WW Norton & Co.
  14. Physicians' Health Study Group. Preliminary report: Findings from the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians' Health Study. New England Journal of Medicine 318:262–264, 1988.
  15. Standards of Reporting Trials Group. A proposal for structured reporting of randomized clinical trials. JAMA 272:1926–1931, 1994.
  16. Relman AS. Peer review in scientific journals: What good is it? Western Journal of Medicine 153:520–522; 1990.
  17. Bero L, Rennie D. The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. JAMA 274:1935–1938, 1995.
  18. Scientists deplore flight from reason. New York Times, June 6, 1995.
  19. DeAngelis CD and others. Clinical trial registration: A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors New England Journal of Medicine 351:1250–1251, 2004.
  20. Chan A-W and others. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 291:2457–2465, 2004.
  21. Schick T Jr, Vaughn L. How to Think about Weird Things. Mountain View, Calif., 1994, Mayfield Publishing Co.
  22. Carroll RT. Confirmation bias. SkepDic.com, updated Jan 14, 2004.
  23. Barrett S. The mirage of multilevel marketing. Quackwatch Web site, Aug 17, 2001.
  24. Davis EH. Complementary or alternative medicine. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 9:70, 1996.
  25. Hatfield D. In defense of the establishment. ACSH News & Views 6(2):6–7, 1985.
  26. Peterson S. Spinning on science's shores. The Skeptical Inquirer 13(4):436, 1989.
  27. Arseneau JC, Thigpen JT. The new quack: Pseudoscience, public relations and politics. Journal of the Mississippi State Medical Association, p 202–207, Aug 1981.
  28. Radner D, Radner M. Science and Unreason. Belmont, Calif., 1982, Wadsworth Publishing Co.
  29. Criss M. Science and nonscience. The Rocky Mountain Skeptic 5(2):5-8, 1987.
  30. Beyerstein BL. Testing claims of therapeutic efficacy. Rational Enquirer 7(4):1–2, 8, 1995.
  31. Barrett S. Endorsements don’t guarantee reliability. Quackwatch, Feb 13, 2003.
  32. Lederer RJ, Singer B. Pseudoscience in the name of the university. The Skeptical Inquirer 7(3):57-62, 1983.
  33. Mole P. Nurturing suspicion: What college students learn about science. Skeptical Inquirer 28(3):33–37, 2004.
  34. Barrett S. Problems with “CAM” peer-review and accreditation. Quackwatch, June 14, 2004.
  35. Gunther M. Quackery and the media. In Barrett S, editor. The Health Robbers, 2nd edition. Philadelphia, 1980, George F Stickley Co.
  36. Wilson B. The rise and fall of Laetrile. Quackwatch Web site, Feb 17, 2004.
  37. Koren G, Klein N. Bias against negative studies in newspaper reports of medical research. JAMA 266:1824-1826, 1991.
  38. Barrett S, Herbert V. The Vitamin Pushers: How the "Health Food" Industry Is Selling America a Bill of Goods. Amherst, N.Y., 1994, Prometheus Books.
  39. Kansas D.C. fights anti-chiropractic textbook-nationwide effort urged. ACA Journal of Chiropractic 25(12):19-20, 1988.
  40. Larkin M. Confessions of a former women's magazine writer. NutriWatch Web site, March 26, 2000.
  41. What is ONO? Organization of News Ombudsmen Web site, accessed May 10, 2005.
  42. Barrett S. Truth or trash? Health-related information in the tabloids. Priorities for Health, pp 27–30, Summer 1989.
  43. Saltus R. New hay fever drug may replace antihistamines. San Francisco Sunday Examiner and Chronicle, May 15, 1983.
  44. Meister K and others. Nutrition accuracy in popular magazines (January 2000–December 2002). New York, 2004, American Council on Science and Health.
  45. London WM. Newsweek’s misleading report on “alternative medicine.” Quackwatch, July 12, 2003.
  46. Barrett S and others. "Quackbusters" respond. Vegetarian Times, pp 10–14, March 1992.
  47. Bloyd-Peshkin S. The health-fraud cops—are the quackbusters consumer advocates or medical McCarthyites? Vegetarian Times, pp 49–59, Aug 1991.
  48. Butler K. Lying for Fun and Profit: The Truth about the Media. Kula, Hawaii, 1999, Health Wise Productions.
  49. London WM, Whelan EM, Kava R. Expert reviews of health reports on CBS Television's 60 Minutes, 1978–1995. Technology 7:539–552, 2000.
  50. Heussner RC, Salmon ME. Warning: The Media May Be Harmful to Your Health: A Consumer's Guide to Medical News and Advertising. Kansas City, Mo., 1988, Andrews & McMeel.
  51. Peters R, Sikorski R. Digital dialog: Sharing information and interests on the Internet. JAMA 277:1258–1260, 1997.
  52. Slater MD, Zimmerman DE. Descriptions of Web sites in search listings: a potential obstacle to informed choice of health information. American Journal of Public Health 93:1281–1282, 2003.
  53. Larkin M, Douglas D. Health information in cyberspace: Steering a clear course through the clutter. Priorities for Health 7(4):15–18, 1995.
  54. Lundberg GM and others. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet. Caveat lector et viewor—Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 277:1244–1245, 1997.
  55. Alejandro R and others. Rating health information on the Internet: Navigating to knowledge or babel? JAMA 279:611–614, 1998.
  56. Internet rating systems: Knowledge or babel. (Letters to the editor.) JAMA 280:698-700, 1998.
  57. Barrett S. How to spot a "quacky" Web site. Quackwatch Web site, May 10, 2005.
  58. Johnson GT, Goldfinger SE, editors. The Harvard Medical School Health Letter Book. Cambridge, Mass., 1981, Harvard University Press.
  59. Fleiger K. A skeptic's guide to medical "breakthroughs." FDA Consumer 21(9):13, 1987.
  60. Barrett S. HONcode violators. Quackwatch, May 13, 2004.

Additional Resources

This page was posted on May 10, 2005.

Sponsored Links to Recommended Companies