Consumer Health, Ninth Edition
References for Chapter 2:
Separating Fact from Fiction

  1. Mirkin G. Foreword to Barrett S, Herbert V. The Vitamin Pushers: How the “Health Food” Industry Is Selling America a Bill of Goods. Amherst, N.Y., 1994, Prometheus Books.
  2. Sagan C. The fine art of baloney detection. Parade Magazine, p 12-13, Feb 1, 1987.
  3. Accardo P, Lindsay R. Nutrition and behavior: The legend continues. Pediatrics 93:127-128, 1994.
  4. Haack S. Towards a sober sociology of science. In Gross PR, Levitt N, Lewis MW. The Flight from Science and Reason. New York, 1994, New York Academy of Sciences, p 261.
  5. Sakethoo K and others. Effects of drinking hot water, cold water, and chicken soup on nasal mucus velocity and airflow resistance. Chest 74:408-410, 1978.
  6. Doyle RP. How medical facts are developed: Why some are more potent than others. Quackwatch Web site, Oct 7, 2004.
  7. Evans I and others. Testing Treatments: Better Research or Better Healthcare. London, 2011, Pinter & Martin Ltd.
  8. Savits DA and others. Methods in chronic disease epidemiology. In Brownson RC, Remington PL, Davis JR, editors. Chronic Disease Epidemiology and Control. Washington, D.C., 1993, American Public Health Association.
  9. Davis EH. Complementary or alternative medicine. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 9:70, 1996.
  10. Ernst E and others. The importance of placebo effects. JAMA 273:283, 1995.
  11. Bausell RB. Snake Oil Science: The Truth about Complementary and Alternative Medicine. New York, 2007, Oxford University Press.
  12. Wennberg JE and others, editors. Outcomes research, PORTs, and health care reform. In Warren KS, Mosteller F. Doing More Good than Harm: The Evaluation of Health Care Interventions. New York, 1993, The New York Academy of Sciences.
  13. Beecher HK. Surgery as placebo: A quantitative study of bias. JAMA 176:1102-1107, 1961.
  14. Strasak AM And others. Statistical errors in medical research —a review of common pitfalls. Swiss Medical Weekly 137:44-49, 2007.
  15. Karlowski TR and others.Ascorbic acid and the common cold: A prophylactic and therapeutic triall. JAMA 246:2235-2237, 1975.
  16. Huff D. How to Lie with Statistics. New York, 1954, WW Norton & Co.
  17. Physicians’ Health Study Group. Preliminary report: Findings from the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians’ Health Study. New England Journal of Medicine 318:262-264, 1988.
  18. Standards of Reporting Trials Group. A proposal for structured reporting of randomized clinical trials. JAMA 272:1926-1931, 1994.
  19. Relman AS. Peer review in scientific journals: What good is it? Western Journal of Medicine 153:520-522; 1990.
  20. Bero L, Rennie D. The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. JAMA 274:1935-1938, 1995.
  21. Berg A and others. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington, D.C., 2011, National Academies Press.
  22. Greenfield S and others. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust.  Washington, D.C., 2011, National Academies Press.
  23. Stern JM, Simmes RJ. Publication bias: Evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects. British Journal of Medicine 315:640645, 1997.
  24. Atkinson, DR and others. Statistical significance, reviewer evaluations, and the scientific process: Is there a (statistically) significant relationship? Journal of Counseling Psychology. 29:189-194, 1982.
  25. Angell M. The Truth about Drug Companies. New York, 2004. Random House.
  26. DeAngelis CD and others. Clinical trial registration: A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. New England Journal of Medicine 351:1250-1251, 2004.
  27. Chan A-W and others. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 291:2457-2465, 2004.
  28. Lo B and others. Conflicts of Interest in Medical Education and Practice. Washington, D.C., 2009, National Academies Press.
  29. Scientists deplore flight from reason. New York Times, June 6, 1995.
  30. Barrett S. Lancet retracts Wakefield paper. Autism Watch, May 29, 2010.
  31. Schick T Jr, Vaughn L. How to Think about Weird Things. Mountain View, Calif., 1994, Mayfield Publishing Co.
  32. Carroll RT. Confirmation bias., updated Jan 14, 2004. 
  33. Hitchins C. Mommie Dearest: The pope beatifies Mother Teresa, a fanatic, a fundamentalist, and a fraud. Slate, Oct 20, 2003.
  34. Barrett S. Endorsements don’t guarantee reliability. Quackwatch Web site, Feb 13, 2003.
  35. Barrett S. The mirage of multilevel marketing. Quackwatch Web site, Aug 17, 2001.
  36. Hatfield D. In defense of the establishment. ACSH News & Views 6(2):6-7, 1985.
  37. Peterson S. Spinning on science’s shores. The Skeptical Inquirer 13(4):436, 1989.
  38. Arseneau JC, Thigpen JT. The new quack: Pseudoscience, public relations and politics. Journal of the Mississippi State Medical Association, p 202-207, Aug 1981.
  39. Radner D, Radner M. Science and Unreason. Belmont, Calif., 1982, Wadsworth Publishing Co.
  40. Criss M. Science and nonscience. The Rocky Mountain Skeptic 5(2):5-8, 1987.
  41. Bainbridge WS. Biorhythms: Evaluating a pseudoscience. Skeptical Inquirer 3(2):40-56, 1978.
  42. Hines T. Biorhythms. In Stein G, editor. The Encyclopedia of the Paranormal. Amherst, N.Y., 1996, Prometheus Books, pp 125-129.
  43. Beyerstein BL. Testing claims of therapeutic efficacy. Rational Enquirer 7(4):1-2, 8, 1995.
  44. Lederer RJ, Singer B. Pseudoscience in the name of the university. The Skeptical Inquirer 7(3):57-62, 1983.
  45. Mole P. Nurturing suspicion: What college students learn about science. Skeptical Inquirer 28(3):33-37, 2004.
  46. Barrett S. Problems with “CAM” peer-review and accreditation. Quackwatch Web site, June 14, 2004.
  47. Gunther M. Quackery and the media. In Barrett S, editor. The Health Robbers, 2nd edition. Philadelphia, 1980, George F Stickley Co.
  48. Wilson B. The rise and fall of Laetrile. Quackwatch Web site, Feb 17, 2004.
  49. Koren G, Klein N. Bias against negative studies in newspaper reports of medical research. JAMA 266:1824-1826, 1991.
  50. Barrett S, Herbert V. The Vitamin Pushers: How the “Health Food” Industry Is Selling America a Bill of Goods. Amherst, N.Y., 1994, Prometheus Books.
  51. Bowerman C. Confessions of a former alternative health journalist. Skeptic 11(2):60-65, 2004.
  52. Kansas D.C. fights anti-chiropractic textbook—nationwide effort urged. ACA Journal of Chiropractic 25(12):19-20, 1988.
  53. Larkin M. Confessions of a former women’s magazine writer. NutriWatch Web site, March 26, 2000.
  54. Offit P. Quoted in Wang SS. Lancet retracts study tying vaccine to autism. Wall Street Journal Online, Feb 3, 2010.
  55. What is ONO? Organization of News Ombudsmen Web site, accessed May 10, 2005.
  56. Review criteria., accessed Nov 1, 2010.
  57. Schwitzer B. The future of health journalism. Public Health Forum 18 Heft 68, 2010.
  58. Wellness Today, a special supplement to Health and Healing. Potomac, Md., 1991, Phillips Publishing, Inc.
  59. Meister K and others. Nutrition accuracy in popular magazines (January 2004-December 2005). New York, 2007, American Council on Science and Health.
  60. Barrett S. Consumer Reports goes “quack!” Consumer Health Digest, Aug 4, 2011.
  61. London WM. Newsweek’s misleading report on “alternative medicine.” Quackwatch, July 12, 2003.
  62. Butler K. Lying for Fun and Profit: The Truth about the Media. Kula, Hawaii, 1999, Health Wise Productions.
  63. Kosova W, Wingert P. Live your best life ever! Newsweek, May 30, 2009]
  64. Heussner RC, Salmon ME. Warning: The Media May Be Harmful to Your Health: A Consumer’s Guide to Medical News and Advertising. Kansas City, Mo., 1988, Andrews & McMeel.
  65. Slater MD, Zimmerman DE. Descriptions of Web sites in search listings: a potential obstacle to informed choice of health information. American Journal of Public Health 93:1281-1282, 2003.
  66. Larkin M, Douglas D. Health information in cyberspace: Steering a clear course through the clutter. Priorities for Health 7(4):15-18, 1995.
  67. Barrett S. How to spot a "quacky" Web site. Quackwatch Web site, May 10, 2005.
  68. Lundberg GM and others. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet. Caveat lector et viewor—Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 277:1244-1245, 1997.
  69. Alejandro R and others. Rating health information on the Internet: Navigating to knowledge or babel? JAMA 279:611-614, 1998.
  70. Internet rating systems: Knowledge or babel. (Letters to the editor.) JAMA 280:698-700, 1998.
  71. Barrett S. HONcode violators. Quackwatch, May 13, 2004.
  72. Johnson GT, Goldfinger SE, editors. The Harvard Medical School Health Letter Book. Cambridge, Mass., 1981, Harvard University Press.
  73. Fleiger K. A skeptic’s guide to medical “breakthroughs.” FDA Consumer 21(9):13, 1987.

Additional Resources

This page was posted on November 13, 2011.